Tim ([info]evil_mr_tim) wrote,
@ 2007-05-27 04:26:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:comics, culture, family, prejudice, sexism

The Secret is.. making people pay you for helping them! When you're not!
I am a fellow who is interested in, concerned about, and in my own way have commented on, issues of contemporary sexism. As such it should be no surprise that I enjoy reading the blog, Girls Read Comics (And They're Pissed), on occasion. On occasion, not because it updates infrequently, or because it is only sometimes enjoyable (both of these are untrue), but rather because I often find myself forgetting that it's still there. I am.. easily distracted. When I was reading there today, and Karen (the common author) made mention to "familiarity with the principles and theories of feminism", I found myself struck with a kind of paranoia that a feminist blogger who I admire and enjoy reading from may, just may, subscribe to the definitions of feminism that I have spoken out against in this very journal. Did she and I fundamentally disagree on what was OK in the battle for gender equality, and I simply hadn't noticed?
I followed a link she recommended to a Feminism 101 Blog, with intent to find precisely what kind of feminist she was (there are, of course, several kinds), and was genuinely delighted to find that she (and they at the blog) are my kind of feminists. More delightful still was a reference to the 'power-based' feminist theory that I loath so much, which described them as "simply dismissive and condescending" in regard to the sensitivity of gender-issues.
That made me smile. 

In other news, I spent over two hours today 'supervising' (for lack of a better word) my mother's viewing of The Secret. I took it upon myself to pause the film for my mother, and point out to her any point in which the film contained blatant logical inconsistencies or clear scientific misinformation (which is to say, lies). I was only permitted to interject like this once per problem/lie, but it was still enough quick corrections overall to turn a one and a half hour movie into an over two hours long exercise in exasperation. I can think of fewer pure examples than The Secret of what Sam Harris describes as 'life-destroying gibberish'. 
It's not so much that I don't trust my mother to make a reliable and informed decision herself, based on the facts. I simply know better than to assume that my mother has the empirical background to know when she is simply being lied to.
Tim.




(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]beliael
2007-05-27 12:53 am UTC (link)
Hooray for non-crap feminism!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]evil_mr_tim
2007-05-27 03:50 am UTC (link)
Seconded!
Should I write a post about objectification and the distinctions therein? Or do I talk enough about sexism as it is?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]beliael
2007-05-27 05:02 pm UTC (link)
If you want, I'd read it!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]xcharliex
2007-05-27 10:23 am UTC (link)
How I loathe The Secret.
It's the number one seller at bookstores everywhere, book and dvd.
It's a struggle to keep my feelings in check everytime someone buys or inquires about that piece of shit.

ARE YOU ALL FUCKING RETARDED?!?!?!?!?!

I have, on occasion, made a few customers ashamed about their inquiry.

Good.

Although, taking another point of view, if people are so fucking stupid and gullable as to buy or believe this excrement, then they deserve what they get.
Why shouldn't someone make a buck off of the stupidity of mankind?

I guess I still believe in something called credibility and integrity, is all.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]evil_mr_tim
2007-05-27 03:19 pm UTC (link)
Although, taking another point of view, if people are so fucking stupid and gullable as to buy or believe this excrement, then they deserve what they get.
Why shouldn't someone make a buck off of the stupidity of mankind?


Short Answer: Such exploitation is unethical.
Long Answer: It has a lot to do with the ideological future of the world. It isn't so much that we have a duty to 'keep people safe' from misinformation, but rather we owe it to people to address misinformation in the public discourse so that exploitation via misinformation cannot thrive in their ignorance.

If only it were possible to make comparable money explaining to people that they're being cheated... The irony would be delicious.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]xcharliex
2007-05-27 11:10 pm UTC (link)
If only it were possible to make comparable money explaining to people that they're being cheated... The irony would be delicious.

I agree.

Although, taking another point of view, if people are so fucking stupid and gullable as to buy or believe this excrement, then they deserve what they get.
Why shouldn't someone make a buck off of the stupidity of mankind?

I guess I still believe in something called credibility and integrity, is all.


The last sentence was my answer to my own question.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]evil_mr_tim
2007-05-28 03:22 am UTC (link)
What can I say, except that your answer used too few words? :P

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Here via When Fangirls Attack
[info]spiralsheep
2007-05-28 12:30 am UTC (link)
I often find myself forgetting that it's still there.

Psst... syndicated feed straight to your lj friends page: http://syndicated.livejournal.com/girlsreadcomics/profile

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Here via When Fangirls Attack
[info]evil_mr_tim
2007-05-28 03:20 am UTC (link)
Ah, but this solution assumes I make sensible use of the convenience that is my friends page. :P
Either way, it couldn't hurt. Thankyou.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]aussietiger
2007-05-28 04:57 pm UTC (link)
For those amongst us too busy working [read: downloading and watching cartoons] to look at a wiki page, what is this 'The Secret' thing you speak of?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]evil_mr_tim
2007-05-28 05:13 pm UTC (link)
It's a terrible lifestyle fad which I hesitate to call 'self-help', oriented entirely around the scientifically and philosophically bankrupt notion of a 'law of attraction', and how to use said 'law' to better your life.
In essence, The Secret is that 'the universe' responds to the content of your thoughts and feelings, forwarding the non-disprovable hypothesis that anything good or bad that ever happens to anyone, happens as a cosmic response to them thinking of those things.
Therefore, what is the secret to improving one's life? By focussing on, and thinking about, your problems less, and constantly thinking of, and attempting to convince yourself of the reality of, the things you want. Then, with absolutely no explicit mechanism, you will send out 'waves' that the universe will respond to, and give you what you want out of nothing.

It is.. quite simply the worse 'advice' I've ever heard, promising the ultimate quick, non-workable fix. Mix in conditions guaranteeing that anyone who does not succeed while using The Secret will convince themselves not to think or talk about it, the thrill people get out of thinking something is a 'secret', and the irresponsible endorsement of the powerhouse Oprah, and you have something truly, remarkably terrible.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…